Curse

gameshoes3003 · Sep 16, 2006, 08:01 PM // 20:01

bump. I think more peple must sign this.

Nero · Sep 17, 2006, 09:53 AM // 09:53

/signed

i'm suprised it wasn't there in the first place to be honest, would be such a nice feature

Viper1769 · Sep 17, 2006, 10:07 AM // 10:07

/signed

Mixos · Sep 17, 2006, 10:26 AM // 10:26

/signed

UBS · Sep 17, 2006, 11:55 AM // 11:55

I wouldn't think this would be a good idea.

Simply because, only the leader should be able to have the power to do such things. If you have other people with the same powers, they would be able to do practically anything, which would cause problems. For example, someone kicking / demoting officers etc. There is no real need to have co leaders. Only 1 person need to be able to demote officers. Anet would get alot of complaints about people's guilds being crashed.

/notsigned

-LiamB · Sep 17, 2006, 01:01 PM // 13:01

/signed

-LiamB

Commander Ryker · Sep 17, 2006, 02:01 PM // 14:01

/agree and signed

Quote:

Originally Posted by UBS

I wouldn't think this would be a good idea.

Simply because, only the leader should be able to have the power to do such things. If you have other people with the same powers, they would be able to do practically anything, which would cause problems. For example, someone kicking / demoting officers etc. There is no real need to have co leaders. Only 1 person need to be able to demote officers. Anet would get alot of complaints about people's guilds being crashed.

/notsigned

Co-leaders should be people you totally trust, such as husband/wife, partners, brothers, sisters, best real life friends, etc. Anyone who assigns someone they don't know as co-leader gets what they deserve.

HR-Galaphile · Oct 05, 2006, 03:52 PM // 15:52

there is a definite need for this or something like this. someone has to be able to do everything the leader can do when the leader is away. if the leader stops playing guild wars or is unreachable for whatever, the guild is screwed over.

/signed

Angel Develin · Oct 05, 2006, 06:05 PM // 18:05

isn't an officer a co-leader? -.-"
so be a co leader to kick officers? thats the only thing a leader can do or invite to aliance, if you think your leader is not doing enough maybe you should vote for a new 1, and every group has 1 leader not 2. have you ever seen lucky number slevin?

/not signed and /not signed for co-officer too before ppl start coming with the idea

Franco · Oct 05, 2006, 06:19 PM // 18:19

/signed

Dougal Kronik · Oct 05, 2006, 07:29 PM // 19:29

/signed

For some system of layers of responsibility and authority within the Guild ranks structure.

Racthoh · Oct 05, 2006, 07:42 PM // 19:42

Co-leaders or the ability to designate what officers can do:

-Promote members to officer
-Add new members/Send guest invites
-Remove members
-Start GvGs

zamial · Oct 05, 2006, 07:50 PM // 19:50

/signed

GloryFox · Oct 05, 2006, 07:51 PM // 19:51

I actually have 8 co-leaders in my Guild they are called officers.

This is a stupid idea

/not signed

Stemnin · Oct 05, 2006, 07:56 PM // 19:56

/notsigned

Should only be 1 leader, in my view, if he trusts someone to fill in as leader while hes gone/offline, then make someone else leader for that time, and ask (lol) for the leadership back, if he hasnt already sold the guild

InvictusBlood · Oct 06, 2006, 10:05 PM // 22:05

As a Guild Leader the biggest beaf I've had with this game is the very limited Guild Options. The game is Guild Wars after all, they should have advanced guild options. I would love to be able to assign specific guild ranks in the game and be able to personalize our guild in more ways. We have a website with specific ranks and guild titles, but in the game roster it is just stagnant and the newer members or ones that don't do much on our website don't get to see this.

/signed

Malice Black · Oct 07, 2006, 12:56 AM // 00:56

/signed

The option should be there for those that want it. If you don't like the idea then you don't have to use the option.

bigwig · Oct 07, 2006, 10:59 AM // 10:59

I actually would like some form of layering of responsibility and accomplishment within a guild. A leader, lieutenants, officers, regular members, and maybe some probation members.

The Pointless · Oct 07, 2006, 12:04 PM // 12:04

/signed

The lack of this, in part, killed an Alliance recently, due to the boss guild leader being unable to get on as often as he used to.

AscalonWarrior · Oct 07, 2006, 12:58 PM // 12:58

/signet oops I mean /signed

I think there should be co-Leader in guild